Last updated: 2022-07-25
Checks: 7 0
Knit directory: SISG2022_Association_Mapping/
This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr (version 1.7.0). The Checks tab describes the reproducibility checks that were applied when the results were created. The Past versions tab lists the development history.
Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.
Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.
The command set.seed(20220530)
was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.
Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.
Nice! There were no cached chunks for this analysis, so you can be confident that you successfully produced the results during this run.
Great job! Using relative paths to the files within your workflowr project makes it easier to run your code on other machines.
Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility.
The results in this page were generated with repository version cbbe10d. See the Past versions tab to see a history of the changes made to the R Markdown and HTML files.
Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish
or wflow_git_commit
). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
Ignored files:
Ignored: analysis/.DS_Store
Ignored: analysis/.Rhistory
Ignored: code/.Rhistory
Ignored: data/.DS_Store
Ignored: lectures/.DS_Store
Untracked files:
Untracked: GWAS.ma
Untracked: analysis/SISGM15_prac5Solution.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/SISGM15_prac6Solution.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/SISGM15_prac9Solution.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/Session07_practical_Key.Rmd
Untracked: analysis/Session08_practical_Key.Rmd
Untracked: causals.snplist
Untracked: data/sim_rels_geno.bed
Untracked: ldRef.bed
Untracked: ldRef.bim
Untracked: ldRef.fam
Untracked: ldRef.log
Untracked: ldRef.map
Untracked: ldRef.ped
Untracked: test1.cma.cojo
Untracked: test1.jma.cojo
Untracked: test1.ldr.cojo
Untracked: test1.log
Untracked: test2.cma.cojo
Untracked: test2.jma.cojo
Untracked: test2.ldr.cojo
Untracked: test2.log
Untracked: test3.cma.cojo
Untracked: test3.jma.cojo
Untracked: test3.ldr.cojo
Untracked: test3.log
Untracked: test4.cma.cojo
Untracked: test4.jma.cojo
Untracked: test4.ldr.cojo
Untracked: test4.log
Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
These are the previous versions of the repository in which changes were made to the R Markdown (analysis/Session01_practical.Rmd
) and HTML (docs/Session01_practical.html
) files. If you’ve configured a remote Git repository (see ?wflow_git_remote
), click on the hyperlinks in the table below to view the files as they were in that past version.
File | Version | Author | Date | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rmd | cbbe10d | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-25 | update paths |
html | 93022c1 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-25 | Build site. |
Rmd | b4afa79 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-25 | fix data set link |
html | 088662f | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-25 | Build site. |
html | e54c1bf | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-25 | Build site. |
html | 660617e | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-23 | Build site. |
html | 7453eb7 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-23 | Build site. |
html | 713d1b8 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-22 | Build site. |
Rmd | 58ce82c | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-22 | cleanup |
html | 8690379 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-22 | Build site. |
Rmd | 4191df2 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-22 | add r warm up |
html | d1d05e7 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-18 | Build site. |
Rmd | c2458e1 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-18 | add template R script |
html | 68b8d58 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-18 | Build site. |
Rmd | 4b95c5b | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-18 | session 1-2 praticals |
html | bdd6ceb | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-17 | Build site. |
Rmd | 402daf4 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-17 | session 1 practical |
html | 6c5104e | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-17 | Build site. |
Rmd | 2b8a053 | Joelle Mbatchou | 2022-07-17 | session 1 practical |
Before you begin:
require(data.table)
require(dplyr)
require(tidyr)
require(ggplot2)
The R template to do the exercises is here.
Note: if on the online server, set your working directory to your home directory using in R
setwd("home/<username>/")
The data files are in the folder /data/SISG2022M15/data/
.
We will be using the LHON dataset covered in the lecture notes for this portion of the exercises. The LHON dataset is from a case-control study and includes both phenotype and genotype data for a candidate gene.
Let’s first load the LHON data file into the R session. You can read the file directly from the web (if you are connected to the web) using the following command:
LHON.df <- fread("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joellembatchou/SISG2022_Association_Mapping/master/data/LHON.txt", header=TRUE)
Alternatively, you can save the file to your computer and read it into R from the directory where the file is located:
LHON.df <- fread("LHON.txt", header=TRUE)
There are many ways to obtain summary information for a dataset. Here are some short examples:
df %>% str
df %>% count(Variable1)
# cross tabulation for two variables
df %>% group_by(Variable1) %>% count(Variable2)
Alternatively you could have run
df %>% select(Variable1) %>% table
# cross tabulation for two variables
df %>% select(Variable1, Variable2) %>% table
as.numeric()
and factor()
will be useful to convert between numeric and categorical variables.?<function_name>
Here are some things to look at:
Perform a logistic regression analysis for this data with CC
as the reference genotype using the glm()
function. (Hint: make sure to convert the phenotype to a binary 0/1 variable and specify family = binomial(link = "logit")
in the glm
call)
Obtain odds ratios and confidence intervals for the CT
and TT
genotypes relative to the CC
reference genotype. Interpret.
Is there evidence of differences in odds of being a case for the CT
and TT
genotypes (compared to CC
)?
Extra: 5. Perform the logistic regression analysis with the additive genotype coding. Obtain odds ratios and confidence intervals. Is there evidence of an association? How does it compare with the 2-parameter model?
We will be using the Blood Pressure dataset for this portion of the exercises. This dataset contains diastolic and systolic blood pressure measurements for 1000 individuals, and genotype data at 11 SNPs in a candidate gene for blood pressure. Covariates such as gender (sex) and body mass index (bmi) are included as well.
Let’s first load the file into R. You can read the file directly from the web (if you are connected to the web) using the following command:
BP.df <- fread("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joellembatchou/SISG2022_Association_Mapping/master/data/bpdata.csv", header=TRUE)
Alternatively, you can save the file to your computer and read it into R from the directory where the file is located:
BP.df <- fread("bpdata.csv", header=TRUE)
Here are some things to try:
sbp
) on SNP3
using the lm()
function. Compare the estimates, confidence intervals and p-values you get using:(Hint: for each case, first add a new column to the data frame, containing the ‘predictor’ variable you need. Then do the regression using lm()
)
For question 3 and 4 below, R also has a ‘formula’ syntax, frequently used when specifying regression models with many predictors. To regress an outcome y
on several covariates, the syntax is:
outcome ~ covariate1 + covariate2 + covariate3
Now redo the linear regression analysis of sbp
from question 1 for the additive model, but this time adjust for sex
and bmi
. Do the results change?
What proportion of the heritability of sbp
is explained by all 11 SNPs combined? (contrast categorical coding vs additive coding for the genotypes)
sessionInfo()
R version 4.2.1 (2022-06-23)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
Matrix products: default
BLAS: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/blas/libblas.so.3.10.0
LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lapack/liblapack.so.3.10.0
locale:
[1] LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=C.UTF-8
[4] LC_COLLATE=C.UTF-8 LC_MONETARY=C.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8
[7] LC_PAPER=C.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C LC_ADDRESS=C
[10] LC_TELEPHONE=C LC_MEASUREMENT=C.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
other attached packages:
[1] workflowr_1.7.0
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] Rcpp_1.0.9 bslib_0.3.1 jquerylib_0.1.4 compiler_4.2.1
[5] pillar_1.7.0 later_1.3.0 git2r_0.30.1 tools_4.2.1
[9] getPass_0.2-2 digest_0.6.29 jsonlite_1.8.0 evaluate_0.15
[13] tibble_3.1.7 lifecycle_1.0.1 pkgconfig_2.0.3 rlang_1.0.3
[17] cli_3.3.0 rstudioapi_0.13 yaml_2.3.5 xfun_0.31
[21] fastmap_1.1.0 httr_1.4.3 stringr_1.4.0 knitr_1.39
[25] sass_0.4.1 fs_1.5.2 vctrs_0.4.1 rprojroot_2.0.3
[29] glue_1.6.2 R6_2.5.1 processx_3.7.0 fansi_1.0.3
[33] rmarkdown_2.14 callr_3.7.0 magrittr_2.0.3 whisker_0.4
[37] ps_1.7.1 promises_1.2.0.1 htmltools_0.5.2 ellipsis_0.3.2
[41] httpuv_1.6.5 utf8_1.2.2 stringi_1.7.6 crayon_1.5.1